fission v fusion

At a glance, these two terms are similar, after giving it a minutes thought, the conditions become more manifest.

How to talk about the definition of two words comparatively, have it generally gleaned/inferred to the point of understanding know it.

Fusion is worth investigating.  It is as much improvement like EFI was over carbureted. Technically, if an EFI had 100% efficiency, you could put a drinking cup under the tail-pipe.

The sun is sending water at us, and an equal amount is leaving into space.  A real fusion proposal could lead to making water and power combined.

Distinguish two terms.  Every scientist in the world will smile better.

A laser setup can achieve 15,000 degrees C.  It produces"fusion" should be water (mixed with the ambient air), making Raw elements into fuel and water in a vacuum. How would they contain the water dissipation into space, how would they provide the energy created by a fusion of H while in the void? I have hopes for nuclear to achieve its goals, it'll never have its potential here on Earth, because of life. 

If water crises are alleviated, I think another 500 to 700 years are possible here on Earth. Especially if all coal, oil, and nuclear power methods today are decommissioned watt for watt by parallel working creating intuitive "green" power.  Imagine all the Pt saved for money to have a base unit in the capital when all cars are electric 50 years from now.

For a molten moon to have broken from the earth, there'd been no water; frozen space stratum entering piles of earth atmosphere deposited our water.  The sun 'knows' earth has H20 and is colder, it affects Mercury drastically, and Venus is an overdone cookie.  There are actually the possibilities of using the stratum of the moon and mars.  Outer space was supposed to be an adventure story; the am gov't since 1977 was piggy-backing the development costs for reducing the shuttle weight. :: using Au wiring saved 5000 kg.  Hence my reference of a cueing shark pushing 1 mole of 1 atom into 1 mole of 1 atom for 1 collision, and getting solid precipitates, etc.  Something for science was the 1 mil dollar shuttle backseat barrel for performing tests.

Each living thing needs so much space.  Imagine living in the size of Canada filled with 13 billion people, stuffed like pleased people live in Bangladesh peacefully.  Living on the water, soon, is no option for many people. The "dutch" and people in Japan have some neat six-sided floating apartments. One can now own, to live.  If I were jumbling, I would be saying something like:  Why does not everyone who works for Bell in Canada live in Belleville.

Water has not been resourced correctly in the past.  This Gov't made separate departments directly identifying the environment and Its exploration, aka "environment and oil-discovering."

Grow some fish ponds in "minnow-netted" and filtered tanks, in beautiful waters beside Toronto island.  Maybe you have native friends who do this for a living?  Find out which netting and tarp/filters can take water and remain barnacle free, like maybe Kevlar ones, for instance. Observe if fish are coming, or the food is not getting eaten and retrieves it. The purpose would be to find a tarp/filter that can be anchored underwater for a pool of fish.  Maybe the next tsunami ever to hit a coastline could have a temporary dome, either by power or by the tsunami, spring out and hold any water back from running manufacturing plants directly on its coast. Then when anchored tarps are not used, they can capture and observe any potential possible spillage for easy retrieval or grow fish.