fission v fusion

At a glance, these two terms are similar, after giving it a minutes thought, the conditions become more manifest.

How to talk about the definition of two words comparatively, have it generally gleaned/inferred to the point of understanding know it.

Fusion is worth investigating.  It is as much improvement like EFI was over carbureted. Technically, if an EFI had 100% efficiency, you could put a drinking cup under the tail-pipe.

The sun is sending water at us, and an equal amount is leaving into space.  A real fusion proposal could lead to making water and power combined.

Distinguish two terms.  Every scientist in the world will smile better.

A laser setup can achieve 15,000 degrees C.  It produces"fusion" should be water (mixed with the ambient air), making Raw elements into fuel and water in a vacuum. How would they contain the water dissipation into space, how would they provide the energy created by a fusion of H while in the void? I have hopes for nuclear to achieve its goals, it'll never have its potential here on Earth, because of life. 

If water crises are alleviated, I think another 500 to 700 years are possible here on Earth. Especially if all coal, oil, and nuclear power methods today are decommissioned watt for watt by parallel working creating intuitive "green" power.  Imagine all the Pt saved for money to have a base unit in the capital when all cars are electric 50 years from now.

For a molten moon to have broken from the earth, there'd been no water; frozen space stratum entering piles of earth atmosphere deposited our water.  The sun 'knows' earth has H20 and is colder, it affects Mercury drastically, and Venus is an overdone cookie.  There are actually the possibilities of using the stratum of the moon and mars.  Outer space was supposed to be an adventure story; the am gov't since 1977 was piggy-backing the development costs for reducing the shuttle weight. :: using Au wiring saved 5000 kg.  Hence my reference of a cueing shark pushing 1 mole of 1 atom into 1 mole of 1 atom for 1 collision, and getting solid precipitates, etc.  Something for science was the 1 mil dollar shuttle backseat barrel for performing tests.

Each living thing needs so much space.  Imagine living in the size of Canada filled with 13 billion people, stuffed like pleased people live in Bangladesh peacefully.  Living on the water, soon, is no option for many people. The "dutch" and people in Japan have some neat six-sided floating apartments. One can now own, to live.  If I were jumbling, I would be saying something like:  Why does not everyone who works for Bell in Canada live in Belleville.

Water has not been resourced correctly in the past.  This Gov't made separate departments directly identifying the environment and Its exploration, aka "environment and oil-discovering."

Grow some fish ponds in "minnow-netted" and filtered tanks, in beautiful waters beside Toronto island.  Maybe you have native friends who do this for a living?  Find out which netting and tarp/filters can take water and remain barnacle free, like maybe Kevlar ones, for instance. Observe if fish are coming, or the food is not getting eaten and retrieves it. The purpose would be to find a tarp/filter that can be anchored underwater for a pool of fish.  Maybe the next tsunami ever to hit a coastline could have a temporary dome, either by power or by the tsunami, spring out and hold any water back from running manufacturing plants directly on its coast. Then when anchored tarps are not used, they can capture and observe any potential possible spillage for easy retrieval or grow fish.

Topic - Pollution

I'm attempting to bring a "light" into, and share personal ideas about something important which affects every living thing today.  I have to mention:  how words exist that are "slang" and "vulgar", and anybody should refrain from using Them, and in writing literature;  theres an English word which'z been used (esp. in media), a noun which has 9 letters and starts with a "t" and ends the same letter; please invent another noun for the listener, and stop tacking any random religion to the word.  I'm also making this effort for people on the planet who are not in a "strong and free" country, and can't trust people to listen and respect human nature and native beliefs; I truly wish I could avoid writing in any way at all about pollution, alas since atomic power has contributed radiation into a pollution.  I can't say I have the heart of persons who (a) try to capture falling barrels of radioactive waste, into their watercraft, instead of, into the sea, to find out, what pollution we're up against, (b) also "stand in front" of harpoons aimed from whaling vessels, to protect sealife with their very own lives voluntarily, especially since anything which comes from whales can be synthetically manufactured, and (c) record and document levels of pollutants, to have alternative resources for information/datum statistics.  The people I speak of are "just like" you and Me, struggling to survive and "make a living" like all us do day to day; and to it They 'happily' include making it part of their lives to be there for all living creatures is in everybodys benefit.

Do away with "pollution", its discouraging when the majority of responses go like:  (i) who's back am I scratching, (ii) is it a way to "make" money, and (iii) the a listener 'shorts' my efforts by stipulating "so what am I (pointing at Me) going to do about it".  That attitude is the same everywhere, and it'll never change, but its gotten us to a lax observance of pollution.  It is being reported by the news intel that an atomic energy power plant was "helpless" to prevent getting radiati of "harm causing ions" into seawater.  It is tricky to get oil out of water, too. I, and considerate listeners I've met, cannot even fathom to suggest how to begin to clean and contain contaminated material from water, is there any suggestion as to intelligent solutions of just "what to do" with retrieved radioactive material.

News reporting in the 1970s showed there was not enough oil being produced to meet growing demands, and two thoughts came to mind.  They have discovered there is a limit to the oil resources, and expected fully to see a prevention of Its overuse, because, in the past, fascists have shown acts of thieving others resources to say how great they are, and sources of oil are targets attacking countries for their oil by aiming at making current supplies meet demands; similar to a really bad movie of "The Stuff" with no certain ending.  On the wayside, Then was about the time I started to hear and see in publications of "renewable sources of energy" to meet consumer power demands; imagine it is a creature who creates/uses energy from their intellectual inventions as energy resources, all of which are no more harmful to the surrounding environment than a leafy vegetable; wow yes, renewable energy.

There are some things I would like to hear:  detection and cleaning up any radioactive pollution, making e-vehicles mandatory on earth and making of a 10,000 year "framework" of international laws to protect oil, coal, and natural gas.  Stop any/all use of uranium as a fuel, and revolutionary efforts to invent recycling methods to recover and safely restore landfill sites, regardless of any foreseeable profitability, as in:  get in there - have a look - and don't pollute a watershed.

Before the "blue box" program, there was an excellent idea of having a few bins in a central location in My city, and it worked 'very well'; except, I suspect, "one or two people must have ruined it for all of us" by putting their garbage into the glass, cardboard, and plastic bottle bins; however, the idea was simple and enjoyable because anytime Someone had too much glass, cardboard, or plastic bottles they could recycle and not have the clutter in their homes.

Natives and Nature

Being and Author is the best any Man can Be.

I am a Man, and since I think like one, I ought to sound like one.  Becoming a "good' author, takes being a poet, some soothsayer acting, and a lot of wisdom through experience and learning through listening and by gleaning communication, and also by sharing at least half of it back, not just to be only taking.

When the topics I discuss are meaningful and the truth, it takes effort to say them; and it is only merely "content of information"; the part which We share is how One learns and listens.  Do Jesus, Allah, brother Buddah, Marxist Socialist, etc., work to risk their lives facing fools all day.  Brothers have been fools to ask one Man where He is in some pecking order.  Two Men, with Two Brains treating One Man like weakness, when He is "One Man".

A book I have read usually starts with some preface, then the "Title" then the literary; this is how to display professional English, according to sales and money.  Science is the event of observing, not sales and money, and I have heard a word called scientology, and its a book.  It really is inescapable to "write a book" and have it not be "sales and money".

I could not write a subject participle phrase, or any complex sentence structure; I am One observing and detailing as much information as I can learn.  This will bore you between each subject and predicate, however I'm better than an over-commercialized YouTube video.  My analytical offerings are hypocritical, and I figured there'd be no visible melting of ice sheets before 2070, long after I could risk taking an encouraging remark to speak, and write a fond thought of the glaciers where they are, does the slowest speed at which one can think be glacial too.

One Chief threatened another Chief, so the other Chief ended the subject.  National Socialist u-boats surrendered to the Scottish.  I was watching an after-hours cartoon, it scripted a crazed professor, stopping his time-machine, leaning out the drivers window, and with a scoped toy,. . . does not do much for Science or the listener to cartoons.  I've always believed God means his commandments, in full-light of native nature, means some commandments more than others.  Why are we still in a Roman world, they were idiots to place false gods in front of people; when does it click people will overpopulate and ruin all their resources.  I have only observed as One Man, I can only tell you a story or idea of One Man, if I were two Men then maybe I would understand what it is to be Roman better.  The Italians must've been very creative at building, the Kremlin displays a beautiful clock, I really miss kremlin.com, back in 1995.  Is is not sad a fellow comrade had hurt a beautiful bear, the perfect picture of a Bear for a leader.

One reactor is running it looks like confidence and something is responsible looking; one look, whole story.  Is not a child supposed to learn, listen, observe, become good Scientists, and that looks like sales and money.  There is nothing being responsible there, they could have killed all life accidentally. Atomic means are unsafe to use or see.  If any country could control an atomic manufacture, it'd be the Japanese.

In this opportunity, I saw a video on YouTube where a man showed the effectiveness of his Geiger counters, one that senses, one that totals, and one that lights up when sensing for beta, alpha, and gamma (x-ray) isotope emissions, then he visited the fire fighting persons clothes disposed to show some things are too radioactive to safely handle, and then the Fukushima gate boundary, and the ambient ions occurring were not disastrous to life.

This isn't about money and sales, yet it is a "book", "Here is life" which we're learning.  When the population on the rock realize their existence is stepping out resources, they will have to learn to build shelters in/on water, at such time they will realize there are new frontiers to cross.  This frontier We have put in front of ourselves.  It will be clearer how much its effecting all life in sixty or so years, should people should freeze their semen and eggs?  Figure out some way to guarantee separation of the rods, work in the vicinity irradiating the site:  The direct Area, the hill-sides, the trees, the rocks, the surfaces all have to be swathed in ion absorbing clay and plants.  Similar to the ragweed which cleaned-up /recovered Pb in the ground at a Toronto battery-factory in the 1970s.  With Fukushima, plastering the soil, plants, and surfaces, or if saturated then "digging" which can probably only be reached effectively and done with individual human hands.  Have burrowing rabbits being released to conduct tests in areas about living cells and exposure sensitivities. 

All of Earth being outfitted with the set of three Geiger counters, to detex/record random readings now and again to observe the possibility of any probable hotspot in/for safety.  One is not unlikely to be struck by lightning (esp. in an open field), finding a hotspot is extremely unlikely, but important.  Sales and Money, as discussed above, are not going to be the answer, spend an hour or two in Japan to remove all residual effects from Fukushima, that is really going to be expensive on peoples patience, to all, involved.  They have to clean the area, because over time it will make its way into living chromosomes.  Boating People from every country to spend 0.03 mSv possibility in assisting of separating and transferring each potentially damaged fuel rod is "a goal".  After this expense, I'm sure "atomic fuel" will be abolished as a use in a short story; and nobody will even think atomic.  Therein hence, no one really ever needs to mention it ever again.

Any atomic tool existence in any country belongs to everybody, for business, for happiness, for longevity.  May People create days when All sacrificed time and energy to having given a hand in Japan to make the world safe for all living creatures.  I, How to eject anything from Earth to do with any current nuclear stockpiles, through the observation, safe-handling, separation, and re-storage of fuel rods, other Ones might be considered too,

I've always heard how the reefs around the world would show signs of changing at the slightest temperature changes.  There are changes going on in everybody's thinking because of current pollution statistics.